aaronm
2923
I've never seen a 4830
but the 4831 is very "blingy", even compared to some of the heavy diamond-set Twenty-4s. The triple row of diamonds on the bezel and the weird diamond bracelet ends make it VERY much a "look at my diamonds" watch, in my opinion. Maybe because the 4831s I've seen are all YG, the diamonds on yellow are more noticable than diamonds on white metal, almost all the twenty-4s I've seen are steel or WG. The 4831 is a smaller watch, according to notes I have, about 23x26mm, whereas the Twenty-4 is 25x28 (or there abouts)
Everyone has seen a twenty-4, but here's pics of the 4831 I scrounged up
Dial
and overall
A
I've never seen a 4830
By: aaronm : February 10th, 2010-18:40
but the 4831 is very "blingy", even compared to some of the heavy diamond-set Twenty-4s. The triple row of diamonds on the bezel and the weird diamond bracelet ends make it VERY much a "look at my diamonds" watch, in my opinion. Maybe because the 4831s I'...
Rare pieces
By: Dje : February 10th, 2010-23:35
Hi, I've never seen those myself. Apparently they are slightly smaller than the Twenty Four, and much more classical. 4830 and 4831 and different by the jewel count and the strap versus bracelet. There are much more beautiful lady's watches in the current...
Thank you!
By: maxwellpreston : February 11th, 2010-14:21
Thank you for your inputs and the wonderul pictures. I personally prefer the Ellipse over the Twenty-4 because the style is much more classic. I am just concerned that the 23mm size (also taking into consideration the oval shape) would be too small.
why an ellipse
By: lobo : February 11th, 2010-18:17
i think the ellipse is much more well proportionate to the 24. 24 no doubt is a beautiful piece, but it seems more mass marketed (no offence). It seems like a very sellable design, and more importantly, for the younger generation. The ellipse which i show...