christianch
4118
Thanks for sharing the letter, but.. đ
I understand that some Patek Philippe models, such as the Nautilus and Aquanaut, are in high demand and that there is a supply-and-demand situation to consider. However, I'm not sure how much it would help the client who has lost trust in the brand. Although I have a strong buying history on other brands, I have recently bought some Rolex (where the allocation is way better, at least for me đ€) and even Hublot, as I don't like the eternal waitlist game.
I have noticed a shift in the attitude of Patek Philippe staff towards clients, even those with a buying history. They are arrogant, inquisitive, and suspicious even in their own ZĂŒrich boutique managed by Beyer (which is one of their oldest partners. Do they seriously treat all clients the same besing buying history in jewellery and other brands ? Seriously?).
This is a big red flag for me. While I understand that certain models are more exclusive, everything seems artificially selective, like a club. I know that some models are available but do not sell as quickly as others, but they are still not made available. At these prices? Really? I know that the market is cooling off, so good luck keeping the demand high.
I feel there are two types of Patek Philippe clients: those who are valued and treated well, and those who are not. I don't believe that the statistic of 25% of new clients makes much sense. If the demand is so high, why give one watch to a new client over someone who has shown loyalty to the brand?
Although Patek Philippe still has authorized dealers, I find it disappointing that they are operating more like reservation centres. When compared to Audemars Piguet and Lange, Patek Philippe is doing much better. However, I hope that there will be more models in stock soon. A reservation centre model is pathetic and makes no sense.