But I'm almost sure that it looks a little better in real life (it almost always does). But still, aesthetically, I feel more attracted to 1530, 1630 or Oysterquartz. Do you like it?
Inspired by the announcement of new Rolex model at Watches and Wonders today I’m enjoying my “pre-Land Dweller” model ☺️☺️☺️. This is reference 1630 c1978 which actually it is not powered by a quartz movement watch but by a mechanic/automatic movement 157...
I find it very interesting that it has an automatic movement. I have always associated this Rolex model with a quartz movement. All the best, dear Abel Thomas
… a kind of test model for this case to be used in the Quartz line. Most people viewing it think it is a Rolex Quartz as this version is little known. Thank you for your comments Thomas!! Best Abel
I had forgotten about its existence and only remembered the ref. 1530, to which I dedicated a thread. It’s great to see this reference in two-tone and I find these mechanical integrated bracelet references really meaningful historically and attractive. Be...
Yes, I remember your post about the 1530. Agree with your comments about these great and very little known watches. I wish you enjoy yours so much! Cheers! Abel
But I'm almost sure that it looks a little better in real life (it almost always does). But still, aesthetically, I feel more attracted to 1530, 1630 or Oysterquartz. Do you like it?
Viewing it in person and specially trying it on our wrists allows to better judge it. My personal opinion: I like it overall. Of course I would like a plainer dial without the honeycomb pattern and post indexes or may be with Roman numbers. I like the cas...