WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Rolex

I think this is an interesting point....

 

.....rarity is a necessary but not sufficient factor. But..... what goes into making something stratospherically desirable for a collector is a mixture of factors, and yes, Marcello, I think this is one that is only just beginning to be reflected.......HISTORY. 


Edmond, we had a discussion a few months ago about Sea-Dwellers and my argument was that the SD was a pivotal watch for Rolex in terms of its significance to the brand. It carries with it enormous amounts of history...connection with Comex, connection with pushing new boundaries. 

History is a very big point here and I suspect will continue to drive the Rolex vintage world for along time yet. Of course, history (by definition) has always been there, but it seems that vintage collectors have now really opened their eyes to it and started to recognise its importance. Nicolas and I recently discussed rarity. I am one of those for who rarity does matter for a number of reasons, but when allied with historical significance, then yes, this combination is a killer. And if you then layer on top of that a watch that has stunning condition......BOOM.

Now, imagine that one's main theme in Rolex is collecting Daytonas. Now imagine that an essentially unique Daytona becomes available and it has the attached history of a gold omani logo on the dial. 

rarity......history....superb condition.....BOOM. 

Totally logical. Remove the rarity aspect, and you don't get the boom. Remove the history and you don't get the boom. Remove the condition....well, the auction showed that you get a fizz, but not a boom.

As the saying goes, in vintage Rolex world, these are "interesting times."

  login to reply