Flanker
217
In fact it is a known fact that some record companies use digital resources.
That did not surprise me.
Streaming in high quality can give very satisfying results, that is the way I choose for my listening sessions.
Very interesting
In a way yes it is a disgrace yet at the same time you have to wonder, if so many people got fooled and couldn't tell the difference there is a bigger problem in that hobby.
LoL that is also true
perhaps advancement of DAC processing etc enables them to do so.
I have some...
...speaker cables for sale. Made from braided unicorn hair and gold from King Tut's tomb. A steal at only $12,000 per foot : )
We must share the same audiophile friends
Some of the claims are straight out of the X files, with matching prices too.
Sobering reality which prompts a number of deeper thoughts and considerations.
Thanks for sharing this post.
In fact it is a known fact that some record companies use digital resources.
That did not surprise me. Streaming in high quality can give very satisfying results, that is the way I choose for my listening sessions.
Omg there was a digital step…
DIGITAL BAD!!! 🤣 Actually, folks, digital can be great. Analog can be great. Both can also be not so great, with nasty noisy all-analog pressings or compressed-to-heck poorly-encoded digital file. This just shows that the ‘purists’ don’t have a leg to sta...
Shameful...
But perhaps the real scandal is that self-described audiophiles were so fooled. I was part of the audiophile community for a while, many years ago. I spent vast sums on equipment. It was fun, but when $10K in upgrades can squeeze out only a 1% improvement...
Many thanks for sharing…
I am really shocked as an audiophile. I have spent a significant amount of money on my equipment and sourcing MoFi vinyls.