WatchProSite|Market|Digest

F.P. Journe

So true! And yet none of that matters with art (vs. reliable mechanical instruments) -- part of my own "journe-y" (pun intended).

 

The present FPJ market reflects the art world, not the horology world. I experienced a similar personal transition with the brand about 10 years ago.

Like many here, I knew plenty of collectors who enthusiastically got into the brand and then swore it off forever due to the many reliability and servicing headaches. That kept me away for many years --- the horror stories from multiple trusted friends who said, "Never again!"

But increasingly, I felt like I was missing out -- that I needed to experience this near-certain disappointment and frustration firsthand, to see how I'd handle it, because certain FPJ pieces were so aesthetically compelling to me.

I ultimately decided to try some preowned FPJ pieces that I really liked, knowing how frustrating the road ahead might be.

Setting my expectations low was a good move because those expectations proved commensurate with my lived experience. My Octa Calendrier went back for servicing 6-7 times in the first 18 months I owned it, and a newly serviced Octa Perpetuelle also went back once (maybe twice?). The owner of a large preowned dealership who sold me one of these watches said this to me, which was both funny and true: "Treat this watch like a condo in Florida. Enjoy it for 6 months of the year, and don't worry about it during the other 6 months, when it's being serviced." I'll never forget his comment because it was also helpful advice.

This experience with FPJ calendar watches was transformative. I had never been in a relationship with a watch brand that was so attractive and yet so unreliable (the anthropomorphic language is intentional and apt here, as is the phrase, "it's complicated" when referring to these calendar pieces). I was faced with this question. Do I view these FPJ pieces in the same way that I view pieces from the larger brands that I liked (Omega, Rolex, Lange, etc.) -- that is, with the minimal expectation that a modern watch must be a reliable, functional, mechanical device? Or do I see these FPJ pieces more like art -- like a mechanical sculpture in a public park that behaves a bit differently every time it's actuated?

In the end, I made the cognitive shift from "reliable, functional, mechanical device" to "art" -- the shift that allowed me to continue to tolerate and enjoy owning these pieces.

Fast-forward to the present. In September of this year, I brought 3 infrequently worn watches (1 Chopard, 1 Lange, 1 FPJ) to a collectors' event. Guess which one stopped running at that event? Yes, of course, the Octa Calendrier. It's being serviced right now. And when I eventually get it back, assuming it keeps time fine (which it will), I'll just smile the first time I see the familiar retrograde date hang up -- when the date indicator doesn't properly jump all the way back to "1" during manual setting. Because hey, it's just art, and I love it and appreciate it for that alone.

  login to reply
💰1859 Marketplace Listings for Rolex