WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

At last Ken, some good sense....

 

This article from Magnus is important news, but the way people behave when reading this kind of news (and it is the same in politics or in the stockmarket for instance) is lacking of perspective.

Yes prices are very high and I won't deny that of course.

But comparing watches with cars is just a biased way to put a point and not the explanation of a consequence. The price is not just inherent value and is about what people want to buy and how many are available (offer/demand).

As in every business there are good times when it is good for a company to maximize profits inorder to prepare the moments when the market is low. It is good also to get some cash in reserve to be able to invest and to hire people. We are also happy about these.

And, as you say, there are naturally, period of times when things are more difficult. This doesn't mean what they've been doing during the last 10 years was wrong.

BTW, if volumes had remained the same than 10 years ago, what would the prices have been? Much higher and less affordable because of the demand from developping countries.

Today they have to make a correction. That's normal.

I think that theproblem isn't that prices were too high but people began to see their income and purchase power decrease in comparision to a new population with significant means. Are the prices too high or is the relative purchase power lower in the Western old countries?

It's been ten years that I read on the net that prices are too high and that companies will regret it. It didn't for a very long time and people kept on buying anyway. I just can conclude brands were right to do so. Now there is a normal correction, like when something is a little excessive.

Cheers, Mark

  login to reply