WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

I will defend quite a different position Kari, just for the exercize

 

Quality: I'm not sure watches today are inferior in quality than the watches from the 1980's for instance. Steel quality is better, finishing is better in our movements than in former versions (324 from 315 or actual other movements compared the 27-460 etc...). It is a bit like cars: vintage is beautiful but plastic, leather and steel were poor quality compared to today's.

Real new competition: knowing the huge number of watch brands, at every level of price, there is a lot of competition.

Furthermore, I don't think we can compare car or appartment prices to watches: it doesn't depend on the inherent value but on the demand/offer issue and what people buying them want. Otherwise a Picasso would cost 100$.

The problem is the price level that has been pushed up (like cars, real estate, and all other luxury goods) by the Asian growth from the 2000/2014 (roughly) period.

The price increase has been stronger than the real demand.

So, I think this burst is a good thing but I don't find the same reasons.

This being said, the analysis and solutions are not the same for every level of watches. 1000/5000€ watches are not the same world (and clients) than 30 000/100 000€. A decrease in production volume in the latter can maybe be enough, but doing so in the first one will not be enough.

Cheers Kari,

Mark

  login to reply