The Patek dial looks better to me. And I adore Art Deco. But the watch itself is so long that it looks oversized on my wrist. The 5124G with salmon dial and the 5124J with the white dial look so good on my wrist - should've bought those!
The LF fits well on my wrist. And I adore the movement. But, I don't like the "TOURBILLON DOUBLE SPIRAL" text on the dial personally.
Very tough choice: Laurent Ferrier Classic Tourbillon Double Spiral with White enamel Grand Feu dial ref. LCF001.02.R5.E10 powered by calibre LF619.01 (3Hz, 23 jewels, 80 hours power reserve) vs Patek Philippe Ref. 5101R-001 powered by calibre TO 28-20 RE...
...I have a 7.25" wrist so maybe I'd have a chance. It has everything I love...a great case with a shaped movement, and the tourbillon only visible from the back.
The Patek dial looks better to me. And I adore Art Deco. But the watch itself is so long that it looks oversized on my wrist. The 5124G with salmon dial and the 5124J with the white dial look so good on my wrist - should've bought those! The LF fits well ...
I personally preferred the 5100. But I think the 5101 would probably have an excessive lug-to-lug for my wrist. Like you, Iām not fond of the writing on the dial of the LF. But the movement is wonderful and I suspect that the winding experience is greater...
Even the Micro-Rotor is a pleasure to wind. In fact I wish it was hand-wound. Whereas I was disappointed by the winding experience of the PP ref. 5100: far from being the greatest I've experienced.
But my experience with the 5098 is so strong that I really feel attracted to the case of the 5101. Iāve never seen it in real life, though. Best, Emmanuel
As much as I love the 5101, it's difficult to wear without a large wrist. They only appear to be of similar size when photographed together; ergonomics of a long rectangular case put it out of reach for many. Best, Tim
I find it unfortunate that the rectangular case of the 5101 is too long for most wrists because, design wise, it is so full of charm. But the LF is really great too. Best, Emmanuel
And I regret it because I find this shaped case full of charm (and, thanks to the 5098P, I know how incredibly pleasing wearing a shaped case can be). But the LF is great too in its own way. Best, Emmanuel
I prefer the shape, the winding, the hands - although the 5101 mechanism is impressive, visually I find the mechanism far more engaging on the LF. Also not a fan of the writing on the dial - but this applies to both references, so itās a bit of a draw for...
I also understand your preference for the LF very well. I just find shaped watches very attractive, but the 5101 is probably far too long lug-to-lug (51.7 mm) for my wrist. Best, Emmanuel
Just trying to understand your choice. Iām personally not into sports watches, so I prefer this Classic Tourbillon with traditional finishing instead of the modern ruthenium finishing of the Grand Sport Tourbillon. But itās just my taste and I fully under...
My interest in haute (with the exception perhaps of MB&F) is experiential. The zeitgeist of LF is more interesting to me than the classical legacy of Patek⦠...
And the particular Grand Sport you are showing looks great. Being personally fond of traditional horology, I wish I could pull off the 5101, but it's probably too long (51.7 mm) for my wrist. Best, Emmanuel
the Patek for case and dial design but the Laurent Ferrier for wearability because the Patek is actually too long for most wrists. Movement wise, they tie in my opinion.
Of course both watches are beautiful. I myself had the similar dilemma and I strongly think 5101 is a more interesting option. 1) Shape. I suppose the rectangular shape is more interesting than a round one? Why? I suppose that you have at least several ro...
I love your passion and, like you, I really like the 5101 a lot. The only thing is that the 51.7 mm lug-to-lug is probably too long for my wrist. I really hope I'll be able to try one on someday. Thanks again. Best, Emmanuel
By the way, what option do you like the best? For me it is the white gold version as it is āquietā. Then the rose gold on a gray strap - looks very festive. I havenāt seen in person the platinum and the yellow gold ones. Judging by the photos the yellow g...
Not only do I think such an "end-game" watch deserves the most prestigious of metals, but more importantly, the platinum version is the only one produced before 2009, with a movement bearing the Geneva Seal and not the Patek Philippe seal. And this would ...
But, sadly, I think the LF would fit my wrist better than the 5101. At least, I wonder how the 51.7 mm lug-to-lug would feel on my smallish 16 cm wrist... Best, Emmanuel
Though I guess the result would differ if we all could try on both watches first. I have a suggestion for another poll. Let's run this LF vs GP 99800, beautifully captured by Nico on these two pictures. Thx. PS. This GP is 38mm wide, though the dial is sm...