WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

I heartily agree - with you, Ken!

 

--- but can see the other side of the coin, even if it is invisible to us mortals - who can neither make, repair, not to say restore a watch from the legendary bye-gone eras. 


It would be wonderful  if a thread were started on WatchTech about functional finishing - one of my pet themes - versus cosmetics. There is a lot of debris (dirt) that can be swept under the carpet (rug) where the owner can never see it.

Many of the decorations - then in solid cases - were done to trap vagrant particles and oils - as well as to impress fellow watch-makers in their guilds!

Corrosion is another effect. You just may have a better chance with a finely polished surface than an irregular one. Fingerprints excepted!

The simple act of winding a watch can lead to a major problem - broken stems and things like that. A smooth wind, even if the fingers suffer, is a good sign of attention to functional  finishing, even more than the greasing.

Wear and corrosion, especially on the old-timers, can easily be seen through the eyes of experts - and even us with our everyday fingers!

Thanks Ken for this fine interview and great report!

And I basicly agree with Mister Asaoka, especially that a watch is built to show the time, and wish him the very best for his projects and endeavors..

Amery


















This message has been edited by amerix on 2012-12-01 09:14:23

  login to reply