WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

Thank you

 

I was going to guess that it had something to do with the fact that Christian Ferrier had been working at Fabrique du Temps. If Christian Ferrier had been part of the brain trust working on that movement and took the designs with him, IMHO that is reasonable enough for them express intellectual ownership as the term "in-house" usually implies. The fact that Fabrique du Temps has used the base design in movements for other manufacturers probably has something to do with the fact that all of the principals involved know each other, have worked together before, respect each other's work, etc.
For a brand like LF, I am only interested to know how much of the creative force driving the design and creation of the watch resides within the house, such that I can expect everything produced by that house to be a consistent expression of the team that has been assembled to represent and carry that brand. From my perspective, LF meets this criteria more strongly than most, and their implicit claims of intellectual ownership to what they use in their watches are valid.

  login to reply