watches came with a certificate of authenticity from Rolex either?
Then the question I have to ask, is what is going on?
Is the provenance of having been through the sale at Christies worth the heavy premium for these versions?
Is it not fair to assume that the buyers who are spending this amount of money are educated in what they are buying and
have an idea of the going market rate?
Or is there an explanation I'm missing because I don't understand the inner logic of the vintage Daytona? (which is entirely probable). I am genuinely interested in knowing more and understanding the logic behind the sale?
In terms of the dials, it's hard for us to say any vintage watch came with the dial we see on it, however we make an assumption that is the case if the dial
is expected on that watch.
If we are unable to say that a specific reference came with a specific dial layout, then we make an assumption based on the
known dials that could be expected to come with that watch, period specific and correct signatures, etc. Then a premium is paid on the desirability of that dial on that reference of watch, for example an Omega 33.3 with a simple white dial might not command as much as the same watch with a black four colour complex dial?
However if you can't make a basic assumption on the PN dial, in terms of either it being period correct to that version/age of watch. Then why do we think there is such a huge premium for it?
It will be interesting to see whether dealers change their pricing in response to this and whetehr in six months the pricing on these will have changed to reflect these auction prices?
This message has been edited by Ubik on 2013-11-11 10:07:11