Comments:
Patek Philippe 'Sculpture' ref. 5090 & 5091
Made in 1999 for the Russian market to celebrate the return of Patek Philippe in Russia, these references are powered by caliber 315 SC, have a case of 37.5 x 10.4mm and feature a blue cloisonné enamel crown.
credit: Watch_Lova on reddit (1-2) & BarryW on timezone
credit: analog shift
credit: the 1916 company
credit: bulang & sons
credit: the European watch company
credit: Patek Philippe blogspot hk
credit: bpc
credit: Ineichen
credit: red rabbit luxury
The 5091 models come with a bracelet, whereas the 5090 models come with a leather strap. Their sculptural design is responsible for the name of the model: Sculpture.
Best.
A/ Ref. 5091
1/ Steel
a/ Ref. 5091/1A-001
credit: Watch_Lova on reddit (1-2) & BarryW on timezone
b/ Ref. 5091/1A-010
credit: analog shift
2/ Steel & gold
a/ Ref. 5091/1JA-010
credit: the 1916 company
b/ Ref. 5091/1JA-001
credit: bulang & sons
3/ Gold
Ref. 5091/1J-001
credit: the European watch company
B/ Ref. 5090 (I have found only gold variants)
1/ Ref. 5090J-001
credit: Patek Philippe blogspot hk
credit: bpc
credit: Ineichen
2/ Ref. 5090J-010 (the "-010" is only my guess)
credit: red rabbit luxury
I have mixed feelings about these pieces.
Eccentric and daring, yes, but a little odd too.
And I personally find the two-tone and gold/leather models more attractive than the steel ones: the 'bricks' dial with Roman numerals and leaf hands feels nicer to me.
And I personally find the two-tone and gold/leather models more attractive than the steel ones: the 'bricks' dial with Roman numerals and leaf hands feels nicer to me.
Yes, interesting reference, though a bit odd too.
I'm glad this post brought some discovery! Thanks for looking.
The Russians are welcome to those as far as I’m concerned!
But thanks for your research.
All the best,
Jon
Thank you, Jon!
Odd reference, for sure. I find it interesting though I certainly have mixed feelings about it.
Best, Emmanuel
Best, Emmanuel
Unpopular doesn't always mean bad, but this is an odd design, for sure.
I find it interesting, though, even if I have mixed feelings about it.
Very interesting. Strange they chose to show the lower portion of the 3 on the arabis numbers seems unnecessary. Thanks for the photos.
With the portion of the 3, it looks more balanced at night.
I could imagine that was the reason.
Thanks for looking.
It's an interesting design, for sure, though I have mixed feelings about it.
Agreed. I haven't done enough digging,
so I don't exactly know how this design came up and with what kind of intentions.
To me, it feels interesting but odd: I have mixed feelings.
To me, it feels interesting but odd: I have mixed feelings.
HI Emanuelle, the Sculpture is a different design with resemblance to Nautilus in that it has
ears and integrated bracelet. Please see my previous post which referred to this reference www.watchprosite.com
/
The enamel crown gives it an interesting twist and I really love this particular feature. Furthermore, the "subtle" motif (is there a name for it ??) on some of the dials adds a good touch.
Thanks for an informative post and keep up your good work !
Thanks Gordon, great article on the implications and background of the Cubitus!
And I agree with you concerning the crown and the 'bricks' motif (I think I've heard this word) of the 5090 & 5091.
Best, Emmanuel
An example of Patek's wide variety, quattro.
Cue the Tchaikovsky...or perhaps Scriabin.
Yes, Tchaikovsky (the crown) with a touch of Scriabin (the waves of the bracelet)...
Spot on!
I find them repulsive and hideous. They are not popular for a reason. Looks lika a cheap Ebel. If this is Russian taste that is gross.
Here is a clear opinion!
My feeling is less severe, but I imagine that there is something for everyone. And, for me, unpopular does not always rhyme with ugly.
Anyway, thanks for chiming in.
Anyway, thanks for chiming in.