image

An In Depth Review of The Mark 7 A

amanico
Avatar


This is my latest addition ( and probably my last ) in my short Vintage Military JLC watches collection.

From Left to Right: Mark 7 A ( 1942 ), Mark 7 A Weems ( late 1942 ), WWW ( 1944 ) and Mark 11 ( 1953 ) :

none

I already made a post about these Mark V 7 A Weems, WWW and Mark 11, so I will only focus here on the simple Mark 7 A, or should I better use the plural as there were 2 " simple " Mark 7 A.

The more current, and better known Mark 7 A with the thin case and lugs: ( Picture by courtesy of JLC Heritage Gallery )

none

The much rarer Mark 7 A with the bigger case and and fatter lugs: ( Credit pic: Zaf Basha )

none

In fact, it seems that the bigger case with fatter lugs is a kind of transitional Mark 7 A.

I mean that the first Mark 7 A seemed to be the Weems, since 1940, and that then came the big case, in 1942, just before the release of the current Mark 7, with the thin case, in 1943

Aproximatively 1000 Weems were made, and 4 000 " simple " Mark 7 A.

From these 4 000, less than 1000, according to Zaf, came with the bigger case, to give you an idea.

These numbers are to be compared with the 2950 Mark XI, and the much more common WWW ( less than 10 000 ).

Let's go back to the Mark 7 A.

I/ The dial:

The first thing which " jumps " to the eyes is that the dial is signed Lecoultre although the watch is delivered to the British Army, and looks very close to the Mark 7 A Weems dial.

none

This is an unusual mismatch, as the movement is signed Jaeger Lecoultre...

Why?

There is no official explanation, here.

The most probable explanation is that these watches were delivered in hurry, and that there was no other choice than using the available dials in stock...

There are a few exceptions, tough, as some dials came with the Jaeger-Lecoultre Signature, refinished by the Ministry Of Defense ( MOD ), but here again, we can also find the Lecoultre Signature, as shown below ( Don't know who to credit for this picture ).

none

The hands are the same than on the Weems, and curiously shaped on mine, although some other 6 B had the same, like the Omega, for example, so, to me, on mine, these spade hands have probably been replaced.

Here a picture with the correct hands on another Mark 7 A " Big Case " ( to be credited to Zaf, once again ) :

none

II/ The case:

Here, the early Mark 7 A , and the " normal " 7 A share the same case, in shape and dimensions ( 32 mm / 33 mm for the Mk 7 A Weems ).

Still, there are some significant differences.

- The most visible of them is the thicker case and lugs of the early model.

none

none

To be compared with the " normal Mark 7 A:

none

It depends on everyone's taste, but to me, the Big case gains in strength what it looses in Elegance, but is Elegance the first purpose of a Military Watch?

none

- The 7 A no Weems have a chromium plated case ( except the case back, which is stainless steel ), while the 1942 version is all stainless steel.

The 1943 Mark 7 A ( pic to be credited to Zaf ) :

none

The 1942 Mark 7 A:

none

You will also observe that on the 42, the crown is much thinner.

- The lugs are fixed on the 43, while spring bars are mounted on the 42.

1943 ( Credit pic to ...Zaf, again ) :

none

- The case back received 2 different kind of writings on the 43:

" AM ", like on the 42, indicating the issue year, or the typical British Arrow, with no issue year. while the 42 has only the AM engravings, with the year of release.

Here, the Mark 7 A 1942:

none

Both 42 and 43 have a snap back case, with a different engraving, inside:

none

While on the 43, it is written " Acier inoxydable fab suisse ".

III/ The movements:

Let's make it simple:

2 movements are mainly used on the Mark 7 A: The Cal 450, and the Cal 470.

Both share the same dimensions ( 28, 25 mm big, 4, 55 high ), display a Central Second, beat at 18 000 alternances per hour, and 15 jewels ( sometimes 17 ) .

The main difference is that the 470 has a gilt finish.

Chronologically, things are simple, as the Cal 450 was used on the Mark 7 A Weems and non Weems till 1942, and was changed for the Cal 470 since 1943.

Here a Lecoultre Cal 450, housed in an US Weems ( note the VXN engraving )

none

And there, the Cal 450 in the 1942 Mark 7 A:

none

So, the Mark 7 A big case necessarily uses the Cal 450 of the Weems.

IV/ General thoughts and Conclusion on the Mark 7 A 1942:

The 1942 model is certainly the less known Mark 7 A, and the less known Vintage JLC Military watch, compared to the WWW, The Weems, and the Mark 11.

Still, it is not the less interesting watch.

Its transitional and short life makes it rare, and especially, elegant.

none

none

When you first see it, you are far away from thinking that you're in presence of a Military watch: No traditional black dial, a very modest size, you really have to turn the watch to begin to understand that it conveys a Military past, a Story.

Actually, it has all the virtues to be a Military watch: The accuracy ,and reliability, the legibility, the simplicity, and, with the 1942 Mark 7 A, a very attractive " Bad Boy " look, due ot its thicker, yet elegant case.

As always, be very careful with Numbers:

When you read that the case is 32 mm " big ", you're instinctively thinking " Not for me...Way too small..No way. "

I'm not trying to convince you that you're in presence of a big watch.

It is indeed a small one, but ...Too small?

Let's see it on my 17 cm Wrist, which is an average ( human ) wrist size:

none

I' ll let everyone making his own opinion, but mine is made, and I truely love wearing it!

Undisputably, another piece of History from JLC.

Do you hear the Spitfire roooaaaaaring?

none

Best,

Nicolas
This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-11-15 14:03:26 This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-11-18 03:42:30

Comments:
Avatar
dr.kol November 15th, 2011-03:34
A smart human wrist size of 17 cm? Not chicken wrist??? Best, Kari
Avatar
amanico November 15th, 2011-03:35
A chicken wrist size of 17 cm, to be precise. Thanks for the correction.  No message body
playtime November 15th, 2011-05:14
as always an enjoyable review and read! Like you, I prefer the thicker lugs--yet despite it appearance, still seems a well-proportioned and balanced watch Jason
Avatar
amanico November 15th, 2011-13:46
Thanks for viewing, Jason. 
Avatar
=RWK= November 15th, 2011-06:20
Nice! Now all you have to do is remanufacturer at Ø 42 mm and send it to me...Remember, you forgot my Christmas gift last year! Best, -- Richard.
Avatar
amanico November 15th, 2011-13:48
Now, that is an idea. A re edition, or better,n an hommage of these pliot watches would be an excellent thing and fill a gap... Since how many time didn't we see a Pilot watch from the Grande Maison??? Best, Richard. Nicolas.
Clavi November 15th, 2011-07:01
Now that is in depth! 2 more examples of the MkVII A with one even more 'transitional' Great review. I have 2 of these Mark 7 A, both with the 'big case', solid stainless steel / fat lugs style, and therefore likely part of the batch of these less than 1000 'transitional' watches between the weems and the smaller / plated version The first ... 
Avatar
ChristianDK November 15th, 2011-09:56
congratulations Nicolas and thank you for a greast review. I like the "fat" case/lugs. It si perhaps not elegant as you say, but it has a really tool watch precence to it. Lovely. And no 32732 mm is NOT to small - its all about the watch. But you know how you convinced me of tha... 
Avatar
amanico November 15th, 2011-14:05
It is all about the watch, indeed, Christian. These military timepieces give a lot of pleasure, when you wear them. Elegance is an attitude, and size has nothing to see, here. Best, my friend. Nicolas.
Avatar
amanico November 15th, 2011-14:02
These are great pieces of History and also mystery. Your MK VII with the Red 12 is really nice, Clavi. And the good idea you had is to show two wrist shots, as they demonstrate that those watches are small, but absolutely wearable. Another part of the mystery is that on my Weems, the case back is not engra... 
0-10-10

Load More Comments




 Next Article
image
amanico
Avatar

" Diving is Beautiful ", an in depth view on JLC Diving Watches and others.

amanico
Avatar
Revisiting all the History of JLC Diving watches is a passionate Dive into the Beauty. Even if I'm a Polaris Lover, there is not only the Polaris to consider, as some other very interesting watches existed, before and after this Cult Watch. For those interested by the Polaris, I will brievely speak of it, here, as I did a Review you can read here: The main purpose of this post is to : 1/ Give some justice to these models which lived and still live in the shadow of the Polaris. 2/ To enhance the fact that ...


Go to top.

About US | Contact

© 2017 - WatchProZine