suit modern advertising and a wish to sell to Joe public. The legitmacy of brands such as AP and Patek are that they have remained as brands in a continuous form since foundation. What VW have been very good at completing is a turnaround in the brand and then a remarketing so that you believe that this is an uncontinuous break from the past: re: Bugatti, Bentley, and Lambo. That VW are brilliant engineers is without question - but the Bentley GT still has the guts of a VW nonetheless. The Bugatti is brute force engineering and perhaps something that Ettiore would not have gone for. Still an engineering masterpiece in my book.
Bur why is it that vintage Ferrari's fetch the prices they do? I would argue that it is because Enzo himself was at the helm, overseeing the design and the engineering. Modern Ferraris are still wonderful cars, however, I cannot help recall Jeremy Clarkson (Top Gear) when reviewing the new 599: for his money, he would have taken the 1966 Ferrari 275 California Spyder. To quote: "..it may have milk bottle tops for brake pads, it handles all over the road, but it is a lot more fun." A certain world is not necessarily a better world; an invented history does not necessarily create a legitmate legacy. Personally, I love the Lambos of the 1960's and 1970's. The concentration was more of the flair and design, the excitement of the drive; italians are brilliant at such aesthetics. Rather than making sure through brute force engineering that any idiot could get in one and drive like Schumacher, or Button, or whoever they wanted to be. In todays world, the engineering that is in Lambo is in the Bugatti, the Bentley, and the Golf! Where is the uniqueness any more - the belief that if the same clutch parts are in the gearbox of my tractor, then hell, I can design and build a sports car better than Enzo Ferrari. That the same car firm went bankrupt within 20 years only adds to the allure of the early original cars.
Andrew H