in which is also muses about why Leica earned a cult following, whereas Contax, despite its qualities, failed. Love him or hate him, Rockwell often has a point, such as here. He writes:
"[...] Most of them (cults) center around a dead male prophet. If he was martyred, all the merrier.
The key to having a dead
prophet is that he is no longer available for comment. As we say here
in the West, dead men tell no tales, which helps the fundamentalists
because they all claim that their interpretation of The Prophet is the
only interpretation.
Prophets usually lived so long ago that things they experienced have little to do with life today.
In the (Leica) case of the prophet Oskar Barnack, he died in 1936, twenty years before today's Leica M system was introduced in the 1950s.
Barnack died just a few years after the first interchangeable-lens screw-mount
Leica came out, and has been dead through all subsequent development,
yet Leica cultists still parade around holding posters of Barnack
hoisted up on poles as if everything done today is in His honor.
Look
at Leica's own sales literature: Barnack is everywhere, just as fringe
organizations parade with huge posters of their martyrs as they march
through town.
This is why Contax went out of
business after the 1950s as its products became obsolete, and Leica is
still around. Even though Contax was the better camera (Ansel Adams
shot Contax in 35mm, not Leica), Contax had no prophet to pimp it to
cult status. Ditto for Canon and Nikon: no martyr, no cult. They've had
to survive on their abilities at making useful photo tools, not
religious and devotional artifacts."
More here:
kenrockwell.com
(I hope the link is ok!)
This could also be true for Ferrari versus Lamborghini. They had Enzo, but who is Ferruccio?
Best,
Magnus
This message has been edited by Magnus Bosse on 2009-05-27 03:26:13