Moka-Tiger (Ron)
1609
It's an interesting subject that you evoked
I think in the end, pricing and further market penetration of M.A.D. as brand, compared to MF&F pieces, will be clarified over time in the market place as both become better known. The disctinction will become clearer when selling prices show that there is a huge difference between the brands' watches. I am not sure if my analogy here fits, but some people perceive their Tudor watches as being "Rolex" watches. They are in a sense. On the other hand, Rolex and Tudor are totally different/distinct when one compares the selling prices and brand appeal. I think that this will become true for MB&F and M.A.D.
I appreciate your passion!
By: NickO : May 20th, 2023-01:09
My “rant” as you say, was definitely not intended to blame anyone for anything. Yes, they are two separate brands that are often associated together. My post was simply to provoke thought on what are the consequences, if any, of that? And if I missed the ...
I agree with you, 100%…
By: NickO : May 20th, 2023-01:01
I think Max clearly intended to keep the two brands separate. But the “market”, as you say, keeps on associating the two. My post was simply meant to provoke thought on what are the consequences, if any, of that? Thanks for your considered reply.
No, it was done perfectly
By: m2 : May 21st, 2023-18:42
I am a hardcore turnaround CEO that has done exclusively consumer deals across a variety of verticals, and this was pretty textbook. Well executed. Most of the cos I've run are sub $100m in rev, which is what I think MB&F is. Seems like they do ~$15m ...