NickO
1726
You raise some good points, Steve
And I don’t think it devalues my pieces, I just don’t like the scope for confusion. But I have to say that with a smile, because I’m guilty the other way. I have a white ceramic Hublot Spirit of Big Bang. I’ve honestly been stopped three or four times and asked if it’s a Richard Mille Bubba Watson. Of course it is, I respond! I’m sure no one sold their Bubba Watson because of my Hublot. In the same way, no one’s thinking less of an MB&F because of the MAD pieces. But I think most of us are agreeing there is scope to better differentiate the brands and clean up some of the confusion that the general public, not so much the collector community, might have.
I appreciate your passion!
By: NickO : May 20th, 2023-01:09
My “rant” as you say, was definitely not intended to blame anyone for anything. Yes, they are two separate brands that are often associated together. My post was simply to provoke thought on what are the consequences, if any, of that? And if I missed the ...
I agree with you, 100%…
By: NickO : May 20th, 2023-01:01
I think Max clearly intended to keep the two brands separate. But the “market”, as you say, keeps on associating the two. My post was simply meant to provoke thought on what are the consequences, if any, of that? Thanks for your considered reply.
No, it was done perfectly
By: m2 : May 21st, 2023-18:42
I am a hardcore turnaround CEO that has done exclusively consumer deals across a variety of verticals, and this was pretty textbook. Well executed. Most of the cos I've run are sub $100m in rev, which is what I think MB&F is. Seems like they do ~$15m ...