patrick_y[PuristSPro Moderator]
33705
NickO, it was very provoking! And you brought up a good point.
And I can totally see where you're coming from. Yes, MB&F is definitely at that "Aston Martin" level in the watch world. A solid analogy. And yes, I can understand Aston Martin owners being upset. All I can say is, if that $10K Aston Martin has a growling V8 and all the trimmings, I would agree, the superiority of my Aston Martin (if I owned one) would be threatened. But considering the M.A.D. watch is SO VERY MUCH NOT AN MB&F - not even close, I think you're safe. At least not among serious watch collectors. As in the case of the Aston Martin Cygnet, I don't think the 1.3 liter engine, tiny brakes, and econobox hatchback look is fooling anyone.
Available on the marketplace
13 MB&F listings are live on the eBay market and 16 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
I appreciate your passion!
By: NickO : May 20th, 2023-01:09
My “rant” as you say, was definitely not intended to blame anyone for anything. Yes, they are two separate brands that are often associated together. My post was simply to provoke thought on what are the consequences, if any, of that? And if I missed the ...
I agree with you, 100%…
By: NickO : May 20th, 2023-01:01
I think Max clearly intended to keep the two brands separate. But the “market”, as you say, keeps on associating the two. My post was simply meant to provoke thought on what are the consequences, if any, of that? Thanks for your considered reply.
No, it was done perfectly
By: m2 : May 21st, 2023-18:42
I am a hardcore turnaround CEO that has done exclusively consumer deals across a variety of verticals, and this was pretty textbook. Well executed. Most of the cos I've run are sub $100m in rev, which is what I think MB&F is. Seems like they do ~$15m ...