WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

It's interesting that you mention finishing of musical instruments.

 

I have some experience in that area. I have certainly seen plenty of violins with beautifully even corners, precise purfling, perfectly cut scrolls, etc. that win craftsmanship competitions but don't sound like anything. I have also seen plenty of violins (although fewer) that won't win any craftsmanship competitions but sound great. My sense is that the violinmakers whose instruments sound great understand wood and have excellent woodworking skills. Thus, if they were willing to put in the time, they could make instruments that would win craftsmanship competitions. However, they mostly don't care to do so. My sense also is that the people winning craftsmanship competitions do not necessarily have the ability to make good-sounding instruments.

That is, there is no shortage of people who have the skills to win violin craftsmanship competitions; there is only a shortage of people willing to spend their time that way. My guess is that there is similarly no shortage of people with the skills to be "uber-finishers," but those people would rather make watches or pursue other professions. I further guess that any watch company that wants to make beautifully-finished watches need only offer sufficiently attractive compensation to its finishers and it will have all the finishers it wants.

I may be getting taken in by superficially fine finishing, but it seems to me that a lot of companies woke up one morning and decided they wanted to get into the fine finishing business and several of them have done so to quite a high standard. (In many cases they make their work easier by using movement designs that are relatively easy to finish well, an approach I do not respect.) Assuming that they are actually achieving a high standard, rather than just doing so well enough to fool my untutored eye, my question is whether they are actually distinguishing themselves.

  login to reply