WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

when the ideas run out - you polish

 

This is the view of Thomas Pretcher from an interview a couple of years ago.

There is something to be said for decorations that were placed explicitely to capture particles (loose bits of dirt and metal) that would otherwise find their way into the movement.

In a time when most watches had a solid back, this level of decoration was also a sign to a watch repairer to know what or with whom he was dealing with, coming from whatever an era. Unfortunately a lot of pocket watches were botched or scarred by often inept watch-repairers who courtiously (;-) left ther own stamp of a repair, invisible to the owner - who úsually couldn't care less.

I would welcome a revival of solid-backs with a clasp to show some (!) of the inner works; but if I happen to know what is going on deeper inside - why bother with glamorous polishing?

With that said, I am firmly on the side of purely functional, chronometer-like polishing, with emphasis on precision time-keeping and reliability - also readability.

I also like, dear Magnus, the Ochs & Sohn line - but more so the Gerber 33 - in fact much, much more than the MIH.

Best regards,

Amery
This message has been edited by amerix on 2010-05-04 09:13:59 This message has been edited by amerix on 2010-05-04 09:19:30 This message has been edited by amerix on 2010-05-04 09:23:04 This message has been edited by amerix on 2010-05-04 09:26:15

  login to reply