Carlos22
365
Chopard and LV are also worth mentioning.
They can design and create watches like the L.U.C. Full Strike or in the case of LV, automatons and spin times, yet they also mass produce entry level ebauche based watches under the same brand.
You’re not wrong
By: Bill : November 22nd, 2025-16:56
true vertical integration implies control. A 25% stake gives access but not authority. Hermès integrates final assembly and dial/case making, but without full control of movements, it’s more “strategically aligned” than fully integrated.
Thought provoking
By: Arronax : November 21st, 2025-00:50
My definition of independent would be that watches can still be produced by said watchmaker if all other parts of the watchmaking industry collapse. With that definition I suspect we'd be down to single digit independents, possibly due to hairspring manuf...
Exactly
By: Bill : November 22nd, 2025-16:58
Many respected independents source parts but retain full creative and operational control. Independence isn’t necessarily about making every screw; it’s about autonomy in decision-making and vision.
A Taxonomy Problem.
By: Bill : November 21st, 2025-02:15
This raises a broader question: where does Hermès actually belong in watch brand classification? The traditional categories fail us here: "Fashion Brand" – Dismissive and inaccurate given their manufacturing depth "Independent" – Reserved for artisanal ma...
That’s an excellent point.
By: Bill : November 21st, 2025-16:36
Reviewing"GEO" George Cramer’s threads—especially his perspective on Cartier’s high watchmaking efforts—there’s a clear parallel to Hermès. Both brands operate under the shadow of their core identity : for Cartier, it’s jewelry; for Hermès, it’s leather. ...