quattro
[Moderator]
18032
A beginner's impressions of the Nautilus
During my February stay in Geneva, I had the opportunity to try on a 5711 for the first time.
Yes, for the first time because these watches are in high demand and are far from being my priority.
The steel bracelet?
It was ref. 5711/1A-014 with a green dial.
What struck me immediately were two things.
Firstly, its remarkable slimness, with a diameter of 40 mm and a thickness of only 8.3 mm. Let me be clear: these are ideal proportions.
Second, the absence of screws on the bezel and the very smooth aesthetic of the case and dial.
Second, the absence of screws on the bezel and the very smooth aesthetic of the case and dial.
Also, the subdued green dial was quite to my liking even if, I won't lie, while I was glad it wasn't blue (a color that I have personally ended up finding tiresome from being repeated so often) I think I would have liked it even more if it had been grey.
The steel bracelet?
Nice, quite smooth too, but less appealing than the case itself, especially since, personally, I don't really like these metal bracelets.
Comparing it with a ref. 3800/1P-001 convinced me that the ref. 5711 really has ideal proportions.
Even leaving aside the diamond indices, the ref. 3800/1P-001, with its diameter of 37.5 mm (but only 35 mm from 8 o'clock to 2 o'clock) and its thickness of 7.3 mm is too small for my taste.
Compared to the 37 x 9.8 mm grey dial Royal Oak ref. 15450ST.OO.1256ST.02...
... or to the 38 x 10 mm grey dial Girard-Perregaux Laureato ref. 81005-11-231-11A...
... or to the white dial ref. 81005-11-131-11A...
... or to the blue dial ref. 81005-11-3460-1CM...
... or to the 41 x 9.7 mm Chopard L.U.C Alpine Eagle 41 grey dial ref. 298600-3002 (which I own)...
Comparing it with a ref. 3800/1P-001 convinced me that the ref. 5711 really has ideal proportions.
Even leaving aside the diamond indices, the ref. 3800/1P-001, with its diameter of 37.5 mm (but only 35 mm from 8 o'clock to 2 o'clock) and its thickness of 7.3 mm is too small for my taste.
Compared to the 37 x 9.8 mm grey dial Royal Oak ref. 15450ST.OO.1256ST.02...
... or to the 38 x 10 mm grey dial Girard-Perregaux Laureato ref. 81005-11-231-11A...
... or to the white dial ref. 81005-11-131-11A...
... or to the blue dial ref. 81005-11-3460-1CM...
... or to the 41 x 9.7 mm Chopard L.U.C Alpine Eagle 41 grey dial ref. 298600-3002 (which I own)...
... I have to be honest: the 5711 is clearly a winner.
But it's not the kind of watch that excites me or gives me the chills.
So, even though I now understand what makes this model so legendary, I'm still quite happy to leave it to others.
Thanks for reading.
Best, Emmanuel
A beginner's impressions of the Nautilus
During my February stay in Geneva , I had the opportunity to try on a 5711 for the first time . Yes , for the first time because these watches are in high demand and are far from being my priority . It was ref. 5711/1A-014 with a green dial. What struck m...
Excellent overview. It is to this day....
The most iconic PP design in my opinion, and worthy of any horology enthusiast's attention, but just like you, I have a tangible number of watches I love even more than the Nautilus, and am thus far more likely to give my full attention (and money) to the...
Thank you so much, Filip. I think you’re right
when you say that it’s the most iconic PP design. It’s far from being my favorite, but, yes, it’s probably the most iconic and it’s great in its own right, no doubt about it. So I understand the hype even if, like you, I have other priorities. Cheers, Emm...
Absolutely agree
I'm not particularly drawn to watches with integrated bracelets. But in this case, the 5711 is by far my favorite.
I couldn't be sure until I tried it on,
but now that I have, I quite agree that this model has a unique charm. Best, Emmanuel
Emmanuel, great post!
Thank you for taking the time to post various fotos of similar integrated bracelet watches. Excellent way to compare the alternatives. The Nautilus (any of its variants) and especially the time only and 5712 models are wonderful but wow... entirely too im...
Thank you so much, Robert.
I consider myself quite lucky indeed to have been able to try this one on, especially as it allowed me to better understand the charm of this timepiece, even if, as I said, I have other priorities and preferences. Best, Emmanuel
Thank you, Larry.
The green dial is a model of discretion and “good taste”, but it is also quite neutral and not particularly remarkable. I’m not personally into blue dials, so I like it and would choose it over a blue one, but I could very easily understand anyone who wou...
These are good review points.
Over a decade I found the blue dial would present itself in varying shades depending on viewing conditions, and the proportions and thinness very pleasant. Of all the watches I've owned the 5711 1A is my all time favorite.
That’s quite a statement, Steve,
and it speaks volumes about how great this watch is. I have no doubt that the blue dial is very nice and versatile: I’m just personally more drawn to other colors, which is why I chose the grey dial Alpine Eagle. Best, Emmanuel
Great post like always.
Tbh i have never been a huge fan of the Nautilus and also not a big fan of bracelet watches . Imho the AP has an overall better design . I understand the appeal of the Patek but its just not for me 🤷🏻♂️
Thank you so much. Not for me either,
but I understand the appeal now, and I think I would personally choose it over a RO (but I've never seen a Jumbo in person. Best, Emmanuel
I appreciate you for always uploading such informative and honest reports.
I love the 5711, and I've also bought the AP15450 and GP Laureato, but they are similar to the 5711, yet not the same. However, your frank opinions (even if they differ from my preferences) are very persuasive.
Thank you so much. Seeing the 5711 in person was truly enlightening for me: it helped me understand why this watch is so beloved.
I'm not particularly drawn to steel watches with integrated bracelets, as I much prefer the feel and look of a leather strap and of precious metals. These watches are also poorly suited to desk work, as the strap gets scratched with every contact. That's ...
Hi Emmanuel, glad that you tried on 5711/1A and thanks for an interesting review from your heart/wrist ! Given that 5711 is a
clear winner vs other brands (including Chopard Alpine Eage which you must love), why are you not more excited about Nautilus ?
Hi Gordon,
It's the steel watches with integrated bracelets, not the Nautilus specifically, that don't particularly appeal to me. I much prefer the feel and look of a leather strap, as well as the look of gold or platinum. These watches are also very poorly suited t...
The price is also a major drawback of the 5711. I completely understand why you would choose the Alpine Eagle despite valuing the 5711.
I completely understand why you would choose the Alpine Eagle despite valuing the 5711. I was able to buy the 5711 at a much more reasonable price back in 2012, but now it's incredibly expensive.
Well, it didn't feel “remarkable” or “spectacular” to me,
but I liked it very much still. The color is very subdued, very subtle. Best, Emmanuel
I found 3800 too small on my wrist,
but of course it depends on the size of one’s wrist and on one’s tastes. Also because of my personal tastes, I like the “simple” 5711 better than the 5712. But it’s just a personal preference. But I’m sure your 3800 makes a great duo with your 5065! Thank...