I know ⦠you are thinking āwho is he kiddingā? This certainly is not a mystery watch. But to me it certainly is a mystery why this watch is relatively so unpopular. Objectively: 39.5 mm, platinum, retrograde PC, 2 backs, platinum deployant clasp, winding ...
IMO the gold hands, indices and date numerals donāt look good with the white metal case. The red tipped date hand is too bright red, sticks out too much. I donāt think the gold framing on the day, month and leap year windows looks good. Lastly the moon ph...
But who cares? I love mine, even if it doesn't have the raised gold date numerals like yours. And I love your version too. Perhaps I should hunt for one... let's see. ...
is a mystery to me too, dear Patekova. It's a stunning watch with what I think is my personal favorite layout for a PC (or among my favorites). Best, Emmanuel
For a PC with retrograde function, the dial is CLEAN and BALANCED ! The small red arrow brings a nice touch to the watch overall. Furthermore, the applied date numerals are tiny but very visible. To me this piece is well designed. Perhaps the general purs...
will eventually learn and appreciate more the history and DNA of Patek in terms of design and complications. This process then would lead to a stronger pursuit of PCs overall and the related interest then would extend to your 5496P-015.
And this is just a matter of taste.. I donāt like the position of the date ring and leap year position especially (itās taking quite a central position when itās actually not a key info practically But my main criticism is actually the empty space around ...
Didnāt have this version on my radar, but it is great imo. I like the applied embossed date figures combined with the brushed dial. Looks stunning irl I bet⦠The looks from the AR 5550P which I admire too!