Mark in Paris[Purist]
10488
In fact it is more a measure instrument than a chronograph
You have 3 scales :
- Pulsometre (to count your heartbeats over 15 pulsations),
- Tachymetre (to measure the speed of an object over 1000km)
- and Telemetre (to measure the distance of an object from us by counting the gap between when we see the event starting and the moment we hear its noise).
It is not a chronograph that measures elapsed time over a long period.
Cheers, Mark
You're right
By: Mark in Paris : October 14th, 2014-04:35
And maybe calling it a chronograph is finally not perfectly appropriate. It is more an unusual (in Patek's collection) complicated 3 hands watch that can be used as an instrument (telemetre, pulsometre and tachymetre). And I love this case :) Cheers, Mark...
Well you like the 5980?
By: 4Js : October 14th, 2014-09:59
Yes, I know its an auto movement, but it was at the time a very interesting display for a chrono, and it was the first in house Patek movement. I do want to also point out, as it appears others don't recall, but you can run the 5980/5960 movement continuo...
My thoughts.....
By: Baron - Mr Red : October 14th, 2014-09:24
......this watch has something. It has something of the Factor X about it. I appreciate that this is just a personal opinion and really has no truth other than to me...and on a personal level....but, the last watch that Patek made that had a similar Facto...
same impression
By: cisco : October 15th, 2014-02:48
I didn't like late Patek novelties, (I hate the 5960A :) ) , but this is beautiful. The case is fantastic with this complicated shape, lovely dial reminding the 30s/40s watch (most of the time a telemeter scale actually). The automatic movement can be see...
Form follows function?
By: ztirual : October 16th, 2014-13:43
As least that's the way I like it for my watches. May I ask what is the point of a 2 pusher chronograph for a chrono that only measure short lapses of time (if I understand correctly)? Off course, this kind of watch has been done before in the 40's (maybe...
It make sens but
By: Mark in Paris : October 17th, 2014-02:07
Hey Z', What you say is perfectly logical and makes sense (about the monopusher matter). But I would say that a watch should not be judged and analyzed on a sole logic angle and that some unrational or aesthetical criteria could be implied and change the ...
"Multi-purpose" chronos
By: jkingston : October 20th, 2014-09:26
Adding supplemental scales to a chronograph--which is simply an exercise in printing, either on the dial or bezel--is very common. The industry abounds with tachymetre scales, pusometer scales and a few telemetrer scales. Generally to avoid clutter, most ...
JKingston....
By: Baron - Mr Red : October 20th, 2014-09:59
.....if i wanted to take your argument to its natural conclusion, I would argue that wristwatches of any guise are essentially superfluous given that most people own smartphones. Most complications on most watches are almost certainly superfluous to need....