the Exp because it is the 36mm tool watch or tough watch which has understated design and not many realize its 'the' Rolex Explorer. Its size of 36mm make it more unique and stands out against the larger boys. Ironic isnt it? The Sub well it is just a plain looking divers 300m with turning bezel, which is less exclusive looking than the FF and closer in looks to the SM 300. The Sub is the Rolex watch for me. I prefer it to the modern Dayto, just my preference. I know i cannot compare here. The Milgauss i prefer it to the YM. So for me, it may also be very reliable timekeeping both of these Rolex models that i have. I have bee wearing my Sub 24/7 for past 2 months everytime i compare to my Nokia, exact time to the minute, shown. The Sub is more recognisable compared to the Exp I, that does not bother me. I love them as my own twins with different character, traits and skills.
This message has been edited by KCKL on 2011-05-07 19:50:34