To me, one of the problems is so much attention is being polarized. One one hand, toward maniac proportions toward Rolex, PP, AP, and to a certain extent toward VC. And only toward a select models. There is still some hope because watch enthusists appreciate Breguet, ALS, IWC, JLC, which will hopefully do well.
Now GS is becoming popular. On the other end of the pollarization spectrum, there are brands and watches that people don't even know or care about, sadly, because all they hear is Rolex, PP, AP, etc.
And yes, there are too many brands and too many watches, but there has to be a bigger shift in directing the public..
I think more direction should be given to marketing, branding, and image-building if that's possble.
The world needs to know that there are more brands worthy of consideration than only Rolex, PP, AP, and the top of the line brands.
And retail prices should reflect the true market price so people feel that they get what they pay for. Setting a ridiciulous RSRP at 10,000 when the watch sells heavily discounted at ADs and on the gray market for 6,000 new and 4,000 used , doesn't build confidence in the brand and company. RSRPs should be more realistic. Fist set an honest price at the gray-market price, and see what happens.