Miranda[PuristSPro Moderator]
6306
Yes, I agree, but it looks much better, have a look at these special pie

Credit Robert Maron

Credit European Watch Co
Gorgeous but
By: JJJosh : March 14th, 2025-21:52
The pics sure make it look more like a 42/43mm than the 39mm advertised. As pictured, it almost looks too big and busy too quite work for me. I'm so close to loving it, but it's just off a little.
Patek 5140, or 5550P
By: odeon : March 15th, 2025-15:34
Yes, the Breguet numbers are the reason behind why Patek did enlarge the diameter without changing the movement. Should you need baton indices, it would be better to look at Patek 5140, especially the blue one in platinum. Besides, Patek 5550P is another ...
39mm should be perfect
By: yming : March 16th, 2025-00:50
What went wrong here is the thinner bezel.. thus it makes the watch look disproportionately large.. it happened to the 1815 too, when ALS reduced the size from 40 to 38.5.. Thinning out the bezel can really ruin the look in my opinion. Another gripe is th...
I’m afraid you’re right.
By: quattro : March 16th, 2025-04:35
I find it quite strange how this reference makes me feel because on paper everything seems right and, as you say, one wants to love it, but something feels odd nonetheless. And it definitely has something to do with the case being too large for the calibe...
The 36 mm Roman numerals ref. 3940 has no III, VI and IX,
By: quattro : July 28th, 2025-13:20
whereas the 5327 has only no 6: the case being larger, the dial can and does include a 3 and a 9. As for the 5740, I suspect that its dial aperture is quite smaller, the bezel being large, than the one of the 5327, which has a thin bezel. So, for me, when...