patrick_y[PuristSPro Moderator]
33668
A seal with good intentions...
I'm convinced that the Patek Philippe Seal is a seal with good intentions that will further signify Patek Philippe as a leader in customer service. However, it does seem to step on the toes of the original Geneva Seal governing body and the others who uphold its values.
Thank you for the seductive photographs Dje! Although they don't exclusively pertain to the Patek Seal, it's good to see how Patek Philippe watches are made.
I will miss the Geneva Seal though, I think the Geneva Seal has a charm and stigma surrounding it (this stigma is largely contributed by Patek's upholding the Geneva Seal values) that cannot be replaced. So far, this Patek Philippe Seal does not have any charm to me.
All in all, this seal isn't really that big of a deal. It's not going to affect my perception that Patek Philippe is still a great watch brand. However, I do like the Geneva Seal and I will miss it very much. But as long as Patek Philippe continues to make watches of the same exacting quality in the future consistently, I will be actively considering acquisitions from this brand.
I really loved the photographs of the Geneva Salon. Haven't seen the rest room though, I hear it's reserved only for VIPs. I didn't know the "American" pocketwatch was available for purchase. I was admiring this pocketwatch when I was at the boutique, I especially appreciate this kind of pocketwatch case with this kind of bezel. The 5070 and 5074 watches have a similar case, it's just a pity that it's next to impossible to get a 5070P anymore and it's very very difficult to get approval for a 5074.
Available on the marketplace
2,804 Patek Philippe listings are live on the eBay market and 1721 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
A seal is not a reputation!
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-14:15
Hi, I read your point but a seal is a commitment and a commitment is not a reputation. The reputation comes from the level of respect of the commitment! Regarding accuracy Patek Philippe's requiremetns are not limited to what I wrote but what I wrote is w...
Wise thoughts Patrick
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-14:18
Wise thoughts Patrick, and thank you for your comments! I've long loved this pocket watch and seeing two of them on the same day was something! At least after such an experience I could (shortly) rest in the VIP room! Cheers Dje
Thank you Nicolas
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-14:21
Hi, Indeed that's your personal opinion, not mine! If they had named it "Patek Philippe quality chart" or "Patek Philippe commitments" or whatever...... would have that changed something! A seal replaces a seal! That's it! Cheers Dje
I'll not defend the GS
By: aaronm : October 27th, 2009-15:07
But if Patek wants to present the PP seal as a marked improvement over the GS, and superior to the other alternate "seals" out there, it would be nice to know how it is superior. I'll admit that the finishing descriptions are more detailed than the other ...
No problem
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-15:22
Hi Aaron, Patek Philippe doesn't want to present its seal as an improvement over the GS, and doesn't refer to other seals either. There are many many points in watchmaking that have no standard of reference, so for instance there is no definite way to dec...
Of course
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-22:25
Of course Patek Philippe didn't drop the Geneva Seal to adopt lesser requirement ! So obviously if they choose to change it's certainly because they consider their Seal to be in some ways superior to the Geneva Seal. In fact whatever the Geneva Seal chang...
Well said.
By: KCLQMULKU : October 27th, 2009-05:41
It is impossible to objectively self-regulate. An example is in medicine where, before the Bolitho case (UK), doctors could in effect self-regulate themselves to the point of theoretically winning all negligence cases. This was through the precedent set b...
Where is the Cartier Forum?
By: dan1 : October 27th, 2009-07:28
You seem to be putting a lot of faith in the Geneva Seal. Maybe too much, to receive it One example of a watch must be submitted, then that same series can be made for 1 year or 40 years, only the one watch is checked. Dje said it right here "Keeping the ...
Good question
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-14:48
Hi, That's a good question. I'm surprised by the allergic reactions to this Seal. Would it be because people realize (or don't want to) that the Geneva Seal is not so much of a proof of overall quality finally? Cheers Dje
Sure but
By: Dje : October 27th, 2009-22:45
Of course all companies have for purpose to improve their bottom line, but the difference relies on the way they choose to do it! The essence of this Seal may well be to forbid to do it at any price, but to do it respecting the family, company and watchma...
Then what is the meaning?
By: cisco : October 28th, 2009-07:12
They already "have to" produce the best watch possible It is already the politic of the Brand. So why? I agree with some points above. How can you call that a seal? A seal means independant and for everyone who one to get to a standard. Parmigiani Fleurie...
Thank you Cisco
By: Dje : October 29th, 2009-01:58
Hi, no problem! i understand your posiiton and I understand that you're not at ease with communication, but all companies must communicate and watchmakers now live in a communication word so if you don't comunicate you're dead! The new customers for tomor...
No
By: Dje : October 29th, 2009-07:41
Hi, Whatever the quality is, quality problems can always happen, specially with mechanical watches! The Patek Philippe Seal is not a reliability seal. It is a commitment to do their best at all steps to avoid problems (among many other commitments). Certa...
Why not?
By: whit : October 29th, 2009-11:05
I would think that Patek has had an ongoing commitment to produce their watches to this level, so maybe I'm missing something here. I believe a seal, to the average customer, would imply reliability (performance) as well. You are absolutely right though, ...
I hope so
By: Dje : November 2nd, 2009-01:54
Hi, Thank you for your comments. As I understand it the Seal is a commitment towards an overall quality. It does not necessarily changes much the way things are done right away. It is a basis to secure what is well done and then certainly improve what has...
Just some add'l thoughts
By: eric_s : October 29th, 2009-03:55
Let me preface by saying I would not choose to buy a PP because of the PPS...(or GS for that matter). I would buy a Patek (or any other watch) for what I perceive to be the level of quality and design I am looking for. Having said that, if what PP is sett...
My take!
By: Dje : October 29th, 2009-07:37
Thank you for sharing your point of view! Your arguments are comprehensive seen from your side but seen form PP I don't think that would be the case….. This is not Patek Philippe's role to put a defy to other watchmakers or watchmaking companies, or...
well, um...no.
By: ThomasM : October 29th, 2009-20:56
"Isn't that what the Geneva Seal started out as??" The Geneva Seal started out as a way for Geneva brands to "discriminate" (in all the glorious senses of the term) for Geneva based brands and against non-Geneva based sub-contractors who were slowly encro...
My pleasure!
By: Dje : October 30th, 2009-04:19
No all new Patek Philippe has supposed to get the Seal. If they don't meet the requirements they don't get out! J Yes the Seal is marketing in some way, but the content of the Seal is real work! Always hard to self police, sure, but it's still better than...
Maybe
By: Dje : October 30th, 2009-10:26
Hi, Maybe the PP tests are not the same as the COSC tests. And I'm glad they are not identical in fact. In fact I see the COSC tests as much theoretical as the PP chronometric tests. Indeed the COSC tests are done only on calibres. The Patek Philippe chro...