WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

Dear Fastwong

 

I was careful not to give a final conclusion on the whole matter. As stated above (please see my response to Patrick for more details), this was written as a counter argument to popular points I’ve been hearing quite regularly. I mentioned this in my post. I did also state that absolutely more should be done regarding corrupt ADs. Patek should invest more time to find them and harshen punishments as deterring force. It’s very easy to discover which ADs are the bad guys for the most part. Anytime I go on holiday and pop into a Patek AD (usually out of boredom while my better half shops), a quick conversation with the manager generally tells me what’s up very fast.
On the point of 1854, it is not about tradition. Indeed you’re right, if tradition was the leading force that prevented innovation or creativity, that would not be ideal. But this wasn’t really my argument. My position is centred on loyalty. Some ADs such as Gondolo or Tiffany have been instrumental in bringing Patek where they are today. Whether it was spreading their name or taking a gamble on wholesale purchases when Patek had little of name, that is worth showing loyalty for. Indeed if my company was monumentally helped in the early stages by external partners, I would like as best as possible to honour this with continuous business.

Locked login to reply
💰1729 Marketplace Listings for Patek Philippe