And even if the watch were returned to the same AD, that AD is still not obligated to send it back for free because they can't make that determination that it is an actual warranty claim. Sure, they can take the client's word for it. But that's a risk. Sure, they can take on that risk, since this is already an existing client, but that's going above and beyond. And who knows, maybe another thing we haven't considered. Some deeper thinking: maybe Patek Philippe asks all dealers to charge all clients for shipping (since the dealers themselves can't make the determination if it's a warranty claim) so no dealer can say they treat clients better than another dealer. This way all customers from East Coast to West Coast to mid-West are treated the same! Isn't that the most scalable approach? A large brand like Patek Philippe does need to think about scalability and consistent customer experience. If I buy a watch from Los Angeles, California and send it in for ALLEGED warranty work in Dallas, Texas, I should be billed exactly $300 USD as our original poster did - so there's consistency for all clients. Maybe mine is a little more or less than $300 if my watch is significantly more/less valuable - (shipping costs and insurance costs may increase for a more valuable watch).