WatchProSite|Market|Digest

A. Lange & Söhne

All very good points

 

I happen to also believe there exists a collector vs speculator distinction among PP and Rolex, on the one hand, and marques like ALS on the other. Passionate and / or knowledgeable collectors will generally perceive value of a given reference irrespective of ateliers, notwithstanding personal preferences for one brand or another. In other words, I think we can safely presume collectors ascribe value to a watch based on its merits.

Speculators on the other hand, in my experience, often perceive present value based on his/her self-assessment of future value. Of course the more knowledgeable speculator will include a piece's technical, historical, etc merits in his/her calculus, all with the goal of developing a "smart" view of future potential value. However, in estimating future value that same speculator also must use the past price evolution of other, similar pieces as a guide. "Comps" in my old life.

In this way, the virtuous circle manifests: Price appreciation of past watches influences money chasing current watches for sale. The number of past successful "investments" in PP and Rolex far exceeds that of every other marque. With this as a guide, new money / speculators disproportionately chase PP or Rolex for future price appreciation potential.

We might conclude that demand from the true collector would equalize this affect, but I would argue the amount of speculator money vs collector money chasing the market is disproportionate. Speculation far exceeds collection. Watches are perceived as an "investment" / means to profitably flip by many and therefore the bulk of money flows will remain squarely focused on proven past winners such as PP and Rolex. This should evolve (or devolve) with time, but time measured in years or decades.

Just my two cents. OK, maybe three 😉

  login to reply
💰1849 Marketplace Listings for Rolex