Hello Mike:
The level of rarity should have nothing to do with it. While in law school, I sued Renault/AMC for a car that had 3 or 4 engines and 3 or 4 transmissions replaced. It certainly did qualify under New York State's "Lemon Law". I am not sure in what state you reside. I won at arbitration and then all of the car companies banded together against me, and dragged me into NYS Supreme Court to challenge the constitutionality of NY's New Car Lemon Law. Bottom line, they lost and I won. One of the happiest days of my life was to watch them put that car on a flatbed truck and take it away. They also gave me a full refund of my purchase price.
People on this forum, (like myself) love watches. But sometimes people who buy watches are exposed to this kind of shabby treatment from high end watch companies and think that it is the norm, it is okay and it is the way it should be, because they are used to it. I disagree.
Now I know that some of the manufacturers reading my post will not be happy reading it because I am right.
I have no professional interest in this issue at all. I no longer do that kind of consumer protection work. I am just tired of hearing about how some of my friends here are being treated by the watch companies and how long it takes to get a new watch repaired.
Mark